
Last week my friend, Dr. Jim Clifford, shared an article by William Pannapacker on Slate.com that painted a pretty grim picture about the plight of graduate students.
First, you should watch this video montage, which is brilliant:
Second, the above video is only mostly true.
Third, it’s not just the Doctors of Humanities who are struggling to get into the “romantic world of post-secondary professordom” – everybody leaving higher education needs to be more than just their degree when they enter the world of work. Academic credibility is just part of the career conversation. People need to be able to demonstrate the following skills in myriad ways, not just academic ones:
[Editor’s note: in order to put them in context, I use the professional example of a circus clown to showcase what each skill looks like in an accomplishment statement]
- Effective Communication – delivers comprehensive water-spraying instructions to five-person team with no verbal cues, just first-class miming techniques.
- Critical Thinking and Analysis – based on research and analysis of previous five (unsuccessful) attempts by colleagues, removed head from lion’s mouth in timely fashion.
- Teamwork and Collaboration – collaborated with 89-person team to seamlessly enter and exit a three-cubic-metre car in under seven minutes.
- Innovation and Creativity – continually include fire and roller skates into components of show, such as when engaging with young audience members during the “trampolines and shark tank” performance.
- John’s bonus skills: Adaptability (new employee) and Leadership (experienced employee) – demonstrated flexibility by securing myself in a cannon, resulting in a post-explosion-travel of approximately 96 metres (new); or, demonstrated comprehensive knowledge of safety procedures – such as location of 13 different fire extinguishers, medical personal and digital camera – during the rookie-clown-cannon-experience component of Circus’s closing ceremonies (experienced).
For the record, I used the Circus Clown example instead of Doctor, Lawyer, Teacher, Lab Technician, Financial Analyst, Economist, Historian, Web Developer, Professor, Nurse, Engineer, Researcher or Social Media Guru so that you – our students and readers – couldn’t just copy the examples for each competency. We’re all about learning and personal development here at The Potentiality.
Basically, you need to get these skills from non-academic experiences that live in a world beyond books, articles and the grad student pub.
One comment from Mr. Pannapacker’s article particularly grabbed my attention:
Graduate programs must stop stigmatizing everything besides tenure-track positions at research universities that almost no one will get. They should cultivate an “alternative academic” sensibility by redesigning graduate school as professional training, including internships and networking opportunities, and working with other departments and programs, including partnerships with other institutions, granting agencies, government, and business to cultivate humanists who are prepared for hybrid careers in technology (“the digital humanities”), research, consulting, fundraising, publishing, and ethical leadership. They should cultivate new ways for people with humanities sensibilities to build entrepreneurial projects outside of traditional academe, and make these alternative paths the norm, without shame. Successful programs should be celebrated as credible alternatives to traditional programs with poor academic-placement records.
I couldn’t agree more. We know our stuff about work – and the history of it – here at The Potentiality. We know about wasted talent, too.
Look. I’m a huge, positive proponent of people following their passions down, around and through rabbit holes of academia. The comment thread from Mr. Pannapacker’s article is flush with passion for the Humanities. To all those graduate students out there, though, just be sure that your degree isn’t just a degree. Make it an experiential education that is made up of internships, service learning, cooperative education, meaningful study abroad opportunities, and please, please, please expand your network beyond academia by connecting with the Career Services units at your school as well as people who work in different industries – people will always have use for smart, well-read thinkers; you just need to explain to them how you can benefit their organization.
Yes, universities and colleges need to change their approach to education grad students (especially in the Humanities). Yes, many – if not most – of them are doing just that. And you can speed past the slow bureaucracy of an academic institution by entrepreneurially seeking out and harnessing the above mentioned opportunities. Bonus points for learners who find paid and volunteer work that intersects their interests, passions and studies, too.
Most importantly, be more than your degree so that you can laugh at the Simpson’s montage like every good Humanities grad student should: with deep thoughts about comedic theory.
5 COMMENTS
Comments are closed.
My interpretation of Pannapacker’s article is essentially that grad school exploits students for cheap labour, while not doing anything to advance their careers, or actually hindering their careers. I therefore think your post kinda misses the point- you’re basically providing advice on how to be competitive in the workplace DESPITE going to grad school. Extending your clown example, you are essentially providing five (worthwhile, I believe) tips to someone who is writing their thesis on “Clowns, jesters and fools in eighteen-century France: The case of Jean LeHorn” or “Genome wide association screen for genes affecting adversion to sad clown acts”, while missing a critical sixth tip: Ditch grad school if you actually want to advance your career.
One problem is that some disciplines (and graduate supervisors) don’t lend themselves to internships, networking outside of academia, etc., and so spending time on gaining real job skills/ connections takes time away from thesis/ course work (and therefore your supervisor’s happiness). The situation in science is slightly different from what Pannapacker describes in the humanities, but is similar in that there is systemic dysfunction, whereby institutions and supervisors are rewarded for cranking out as many grad students as possible, without regard for their employment prospects. Would-be grad students beware.
I mostly totally disagree with you, Awesome Julian.
You found what you wanted in the Pannapacker article – and one of the things I do agree on/with is that there is an argument that grad students = cheap labour. This being said, much of the article focuses on the lack of employable, non-academic skills that grad students fail to receive as part of their education – you touch on this nicely in your second paragraph.
I’m quite wary of your/Pannapacker’s point about ditching grad school as part of a viable career move. Bachelor degrees are table stakes in today’s professional world – everybody has one or needs to get one. So, there is a ton of value to a graduate degree – avoiding grad school won’t advance your career in any way. Now. This being said, whether it’s a bachelor or masters degree, a person must be more than just their academic self/dimension/CV. There are ways for even the most unfortunately-slave-driven grad student to parlay such experience into meaningful, career-ready statements. And, give me a break, there are ways to exist beyond the Sauron-like grip of supervisors (that’s right, I called what you do to your grad students pure evil, Julian) – all it takes is, say, 30 hours or less per term to apply skills in a non-academic way, such as volunteering or working in a part-time job (fun fact, the majority of grad students in Canada work part-time while in school).
Anyway, I’m sure we’ll hoist a glass or two of good scotch and further this discussion. As you’re on the bleeding edge of this debate, good sir, I trust your opinion, judgment and ideas more than I trust most. Perhaps we can agree that any grad student needs to go into the experience with their eyes wide open, knowing that this next rung of academia by no means guarantees career success.
Thanks, Julian.
I think both us need to be clear about what we mean by “graduate degree”. I am referring to a largely academic degree in a not-very-applied/ not-industry-related field, and I think this is what Pannapacker is talking about as well. Obviously, such degrees are critical for some career paths. My point is that graduate degrees are not (or shouldn’t be) necessary for many career paths. For example, a would-be clown would do much better by focusing on their clown skills and networking than on an academic thesis. This has nothing to do with the “intellectualness” of a career – as Pannapacker concludes, “universities do not have a monopoly on the “life of the mind.””
In both your post and your comment, I get the sense that you are saying that people can pick up employable skills/ experience / career-ready statements on the side, in that 30 hours per term of volunteering or part-time job. My question is: why do it on the side? If that’s what is going to get you ahead, why not focus on it as full time as you can?
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/08/29/Going-to-College-Worth-It/
Ouch.
And this is the Economist article that they talk about.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexington/2011/04/higher_education?fsrc=scn/tw/te/mt/isitreallythenextbubble
Double ouch.